A comment here, while many of us believe that most of these rapes, pimping and exploitation of barely teenage girls (girls who doubtlessly perceive themselves to be more or less adults, and I might imagine flaunt and strut their bodies, a terrible shame on our Western culture) are committed by persons of immigrant origin (in Finland, foreigners and immigrants already commit up to half to 70% of sexual assaults in areas where they make 7% to 10% of the population) but the attackers are by no means all muslims or Africans, even though many are, according to criminal statistics, also our eastern neighbours, while drunk, have some differing opinions regarding the right of women to say no... And of course rest of the rapes, or even most in most parts of Finland, are commmitted by Finns.
I'm starting to have a sinking feeling there is something terribly wrong about sexual relations in Sweden in general. Is it the elimination of sex roles? Do women somehow behave in a manner that utterly dehumanizes them as women, for the men to rape? Because I'm convinced in some of the cases I posted, native Swedish men MUST be involved. If in a culture of a country rape, forced sexual activity and exploitation, especially of young women or teens comes to be seen as just "something pretty common" and if there are little (to none) legal consequences, as my post reveals, might "it's just a bit of rape..." become mainstream culture - among more of the population than Africans and Muslims (who, culturally, view rape completely differently from Western secular individualists, another thing multiculturalists without fail deny, in fact, if you point out that in sub-saharan Africa the first sexual encounter for 30% of more of women, often little girls, is rape or gang-rape, you are simply called a racist, the fact that rape is so common bizarrely being meaningless - now, people from a culture where rape is not even known as rape, why do multiculturalists suppose they behave differently, in, say Belguim? Or Sweden? Especially if they are not punished?)
A final problem that to some "masks" the issue or make irrelevant comments Savant or I or you might make, is that the non-judgmental, tolerant, pro-immigration clique always shout that MOST RAPISTS ARE STILL FINNS or SWEDES or BRITS as that in itself refutes something. Let us examine this claim.
In a society where 95% to 80% of the population are Finns or Swedes, it would be pretty incredible if most rapists were NOT "natives". For example the "final refutation" to Finnish liberals is that Finnish men make most of the rapes in ABSOLUTE numbers, and they also commit a lot sexual violence that is never reported to the police (for some reason, they fail to see that immigrants can as well commit such acts that are never reported, for example in forced marriages the women are raped daily, sometimes several times during a day).
Of course the problem is this: if in a city like Helsinki a 10% population of immigrants commits 50% of rape THEY ARE MASSIVELY OVER REPRESENTED. They should commit 10% of sexual assaults if "they don't rape any more than Finns". But the number is 50%. And because 5%+ of the immigrants are culturally close to Finns, we must assume that 5% or less of the population is somehow behind 50% of sexual crime. This should be a problem dealt with swiftly, as by simply dealing with a small part of the population somehow, we could eliminate up 50% of crime of the worst sort, crime that leaves families torn and victims permanently tormented and scarred.
Deportations of caught individuals, long sentences and enforcement of local cultural mores would probably deter many rapists: you would certainly end up having to deport or lock up only a minority of rape-inclined persons if they knew they will face very harsh repercussions lest they indulge in a little rape. But it almost feels like preventing rape, in the EU of human-rights, has become a human-rights infringement. Do any of you find this even remotely reasonable?
Yet, I have not met a single left-wing enthusiast who can wrap his brains around this fact. Only absolute numbers matter to them, because it supports their twisted world view. If 1% of the population, all from some Crapistan, performed 49% of all random street rapes, it would not matter to them: after all, Finns, 99% of the population, would still commit most, that is 51% of rape so THERE IS NO ISSUE. I sometimes wonder if they've gone through basic math in ground school
